Forensic evaluation of the NCAAF matchup between Clemson Tigers and Miami Hurricanes reveals a heavily bet Miami side supported by consistent sharp market steam, while Clemson exhibits significant drift on extended moneyline numbers. Market movement indicates backing for Miami at the key -7 spread. Clemson holds an eight-day rest advantage and strong home venue splits, establishing competitive value on the inflated multi-score spreads despite missing personnel. We identify sustainable discrepancies across spreads and moneyline tiers aligning with professional closing models.